"The Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS or the Policy) is a joint policy of Canada’s three federal research agencies – the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), or “the Agencies.” All researchers who apply for research ethics board approval must be familiar with the most current version of the TCPS2 by completing the TCPS2:CORE (Course on Research Ethics).
At Emily Carr University, all research involving human participation requires prior review and approval by the Emily Carr University Research Ethics Board (ECU-REB).
British Columbia's Personal Information Protection Act came into effect in January 2004. Under PIPA, individuals have the right to access their own personal information. The law also states the rules by which organizations can collect, use, and disclose personal information from customers, clients and/or employees.
The purposes of this Act are to make public bodies more accountable to the public and to protect personal privacy by: giving the public a right of access to records: giving individuals a right of access to, and a right to request correction of personal information about themselves; specifying limited exceptions to the rights of access preventing the unauthorized collection, use or disclosure of personal information by public bodies; and providing for an independent review of decisions made under this Act. Privacy and FIPPA training is available for Emily Carr researchers here: https://courses.ecuad.ca/course/view.php?id=1696
The purposes of this Code are as follows: to foster a society in British Columbia in which there are no impediments to full and free participation in the economic, social, political and cultural life of British Columbia; to promote a climate of understanding and mutual respect where all are equal in dignity and rights; to prevent discrimination prohibited by this Code; to identify and eliminate persistent patterns of inequality associated with discrimination prohibited by this Code; to provide a means of redress for those persons who are discriminated against contrary to this Code.
Sally Armstrong in her 2019 Massey Lectures “Power Shift: The Longest Revolution” describes how gender discrimination through research biases has “sidelined half the population.” -
In 2020 the BC Office of the Human Rights Commissioner (BCOHRC) produced a report highlighting the need to address systemic racial biases in research by collecting race-based data with care. They named their report, “Disaggregated demographic data collection in British Columbia: The Grandmother Perspective.”
Besides government and institutional policies, ethical guidelines have been developed for organizations, community groups, First Nations, and others who want researchers and creative practitioners to understand ethical concerns that are specific to their settings. These are a few that relate specifically to artists, designers, and others who take up research-creation or other creative methods in research.
Think Before You Appropriate: A Guide for Creators and Designers (2015)
People and cultures have always exchanged and borrowed ideas from each other to create new forms of art and symbolic expression. Whether intentionally or not, most if not all human creations reflect varied sources of inspiration.
Why, then, are some products negatively labelled “cultural appropriation” or their creators accused of disrespecting the very cultures they found inspiring? And why do products inspired from Indigenous cultural heritage seem to spark particularly strong reactions and pushback? This guide unpacks these important questions. It provides advice to designers and marketers on why and how to avoid misappropriation, and underlines the mutual benefits of responsible collaborations with Indigenous artists and communities.
Toolbox in RCRC: Synthesis of Responsible Conduct in Research-Creation Issues and Proposal of Reflective Tools (RCRC Toolbox, 2018).
Related to research-ethics, this guide provides training for those using research-creation methods or other creative practices in research to apply principles of responsible conduct in research (RCR) in their disciplines. Examples and explanations are based on the authors’ large scale and international study of existing literature and practices.
Research 101: A Manifesto for Ethical Research in the Downtown Eastside (DTES)
The participants and co-authors of this guideline for researchers and media producers seeking to work in Vancouver’s DTES included peer leaders in a wide variety of DTES organizations (e.g. Hives for Humanity, Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, Western Aboriginal Harm Reduction Society, PACE Society, Vancouver Native Health Society, Spikes on Bikes, Sex Workers United Against Violence, BC Association of People On Methadone, Culture Saves Lives, Illicit, Carnegie Community Action Project, and the BC Centre on Substance Use). It has been widely circulated in research settings as well as with creative producers, and thus have set standards for projects in this over-researched and under-served community.
Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods
Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods (2014) presents ideas and considerations for researchers who make use of visual research methods with human participants. Susan Cox, from UBC's W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics and former external member of the ECU-REB, is a lead author of this document. Other members of the ECU-REB contributed feedback during its preparation.
Christina Clark-Kazak, with CCR, CARFMS and CRS, 2017. "Ethical Considerations: Research with People in Situations of Forced Migration," Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees
Research can contribute to better understanding of the forced migration experience to inform policy and programming, but it can also cause inconvenience and harm to research respondents.[1] In situations of forced migration, the stakes are particularly high because of precarious legal status, unequal power relations, far-reaching anti-terrorism legislation, and the criminalization of migration. In response, the Canadian Council for Refugees, York University’s Centre for Refugee Studies, and the Canadian Association for Refugee and Forced Migration Studies collaborated to complement established ethical principles with specific ethical considerations for research with people in situations of forced migration. This document highlights our guiding principles and applies the ethical concepts of voluntary, informed consent; respect for privacy; and cost-benefit analysis. It is of relevance to anyone involved in gathering information—whether in an academic or community setting—and those who are asked to take part in research. Also see, International Association for the Study of Forced Migration: Code of Ethics.
Autoethnography and Research Ethics at OCAD University
The Research Ethics Board (REB) at OCAD University prepared this guidance document to ensure that autoethnographic research be carried out in an ethical manner, and that they include prior research ethics review. The document describes how, "It is important to note that when pursuing an answer to a research question, any individual (including the researcher) who features or provides data are considered human participants for REB purposes.” – Elizabeth Dauphinee’s 2010 article, “The Ethics of Autoethnography” further describes and demonstrates autoethnography’s problematic relationship to questions of truth, power, and ethics, while using the method itself. Its aim is to bring awareness and assist researchers to make the most ethical use of the method.
Dauphinee, Elizabeth. “The Ethics of Autoethnography.” Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 3, 2010, pp. 799–818. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40783297. Accessed 6 Feb. 2023.
library@ecuad.ca 604-844-3840 520 East 1st Avenue, Vancouver, BC